ORDER

Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J) :

Highlighting the facts of the case, learned counsel for the applicant has drawn our attention to the impugned order dated 21.06.2019 (Annexure A1) whereby the representation 12.10.2018 of the applicant had been rejected by the respondents stating that his request for grant of seniority and fixation of his pay at par with his batch-mates (drivers) w.e.f. 29.10.2008 alongwith all the consequential benefits viz. promotion, pay and allowance and arrears of pay etc. has been considered in detail but the same has not been found feasible for acceptance by the competent authority.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant has drawn reference to the fact that initially an OA No.3271/2009 had been preferred by the applicant before this Tribunal, which was dismissed on 10.10.2011, subsequent to which, a review petition was also preferred by him, which got dismissed as well. Thereafter, a writ petition bearing W.P.(C) No.899/2013 was filed before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi and vide decision dated 21.02.2