SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 552

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sakshi Bhadoria – Appellant
Versus
Union Public Service Commission – Respondent


ORDER

By Hon’ble Mr. Anand Mathur, Member (A): Brief facts of the case, as enumerated by the applicant in the OA, are that pursuant to Vacancy Advertisement No.10/2019 published by the Union Public Service Commission [Respondent no.1] for filling up four vacancies of Livestock Officer in the Department of Animal Husbandry & Dairying [Respondent no.2], the applicant participated in the interview conducted on 13th and 14th January, 2022. Consequent upon the said interview, respondents no.1 recommended four candidates for appointment to the post of Livestock Officer and the applicant’s name was kept in the reserved/wait list atserial no.1.1.1 Out of the four recommended candidates, one Dr. Lande Vinay Suresh declined to accept the offer of appointment, which was initially sent to him throughofficial email dated 18.08.2022 and subsequently throughSpeed Post on 12.09.2022. 1.2 Respondent no.1 issued another Advertisement No.10/20 for filling up three posts of Livestock Officer other than the posts already advertised videAdvertisement No.10/19. Since a subsequent notification cannot be issued for the same post before the currency of the reserved/wait list of the earlier selecti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top