Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Om Prakash VII, Member-J, Mohan Pyare, Member-A
Mahendra Kumar Pal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through General Manager, North Central Railway, Allahabad – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. recruitment process and applicant's progression until result withholding. (Para 2) |
| 2. respondents allege omr tampering leading to candidature rejection. (Para 3) |
| 3. applicant's arguments: no tampering, post-computer evaluation invalid. (Para 7) |
| 4. respondents defend: erasures violate omr instructions justifying rejection. (Para 8) |
| 5. precedents: multiple marks or minor errors warrant deduction, not disqualification. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. no tampering proven; manual re-evaluation after computer scan illegal. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 7. oa allowed; declare result and appoint applicant. (Para 16) |
ORDER
Per Justice Om Prakash VII, Member-J
By means of this Original Application (OA), the applicant has sought the following relief(s):-
“(a) To issue an order or direction in the suitable nature directing the respondents to declare the result of the applicant under the OBC category and then provide him an appointment against the vacancies which notified under the Employment Notice No. 01/2010 dated 19.12.2010 alongwith all consequential benefits within specified period, which may be fixed by this Hon’ble Tribunal.
(b) To issue any order or direction to the respondents which the Hon’bl
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
