Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ramesh Singh Thakur, Judicial Member
Premjeet Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. casual worker's widow claims family pension after 24 years service. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. reliance on precedents for gratuity and pension despite non-regularization. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 3. respondents deny benefits citing uma devi cutoff and eligibility. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. long service justifies notional regularization for family pension. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. oa allowed with arrears from three years prior, within two months. (Para 15 , 16) |
ORDER (Oral)
Per: RAMESH SINGH THAKUR, MEMBER (J):
1. The present Original Application has been filed under Section 19 of Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking benefit of family pension and gratuity after the demise of Husband of the applicant who worked as casual worker with the respondents from 06.05.1998 till 27.03.2022 and has rendered approximately 24 years of service. The applicant has sought the following relief:
i. That the respondents be directed to grant the applicant benefit of family pension, gratuity and other retiral dues, keeping in view that her husband has worked for 24 years in the respondent department. She be also held entitled for interest at 12% per annum on delayed payments of above mentioned retiral
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
