SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 1009

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manzoor Hussain – Appellant
Versus
D/o Rural Development Ut Of J&k – Respondent


ORDER (ORAL)

Mr. Justice L. Narasimha Reddy:

The applicant states that he was engaged as Daily Rated Worker in the Block Development Officer, Mandi, District Poonch, from 1994 onwards, and that he made repeated representations for his regularization in terms of SRO No.64 of 1994. Complaining that his representation has not been considered, he filed SWP.No.1694/2004, with a prayer to direct the respondents to consider his case.

2. Earlier, the applicant filed SWP No.1691/2003, before the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu and Kashmir, complaining that the respondents are not considering his case for regularization. The Writ Petition was disposed of directing the respondents to verify the records and pass appropriate orders. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 02.09.2004 was passed stating that the applicant was engaged only during the month of February 1994 and paid wages for that, and he did not work during any other period as claimed. Accordingly, he does not fit in the parameters of SRO No.64/2001. Challenging that, the applicant filed SWP.No.1694/2004 before the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu & Kashmir. He pleaded that the view taken by the respondents in the impugned order is not correct

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top