O.A.No. 200/01104/2023
Page 1 of 3
1
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, JABALPUR BENCH
JABALPUR
Original Application No.200/01104/2023
Jabalpur, this Thursday, the 30th day of November, 2023
HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE AKHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
HON’BLE SHRI KUMAR RAJESH CHANDRA, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER
Aakash Agrawal
S/o Shri Rakesh Kumar Agrawal
DOB 20.09.1988
Working as Postal Assistant SBCO Sagar Cantt. HO
R/o H.No. 126 Near Sahu Tigadda Biyasa Mohalla
Sagar (MP) 470002
-Applicant
(By Advocate –Shri Vijay Tripathi)
V e r s u s
1. Union of India, Through its Secretary
Ministry of Communication & IT Department of Posts
Dak Bhawan Sansad Marg New Delhi 110001
2. Chief Post Master General Madhya Pradesh Circle
Hoshangabad Road, Bhopal 462012 (MP)
3. Director Postal Services O/o Post Master General
Jabalpur Region Jabalpur 482001 (MP)
4. Sr. Superintendent of Post Offices Sagar Division
Sagar 470001 (MP)
- Respondents
(By Advocate –Shri S.P. Singh)
O.A.No. 200/01104/2023
Page 2 of 3
2
By Justice Akhil Kumar Srivastava, JM;
By way of this Original Application applicant is calling in
question the legality, validity and propriety of the charge sheet
dated 20.04.2023 (annexure A/1), 17.04.2023 (annexure A/2) &
01.05.2023 (annexure A/3). He also challenging the order dated
30.10.2023 (Annexure A/4), 30.10.2023 (Annexure A/5) and
06.10.2023 Annexure A/6), whereby punishment of recovery of
Rs.5,00,000/- withholding of increment for one year without
cumulative effect Rs.1,60,000/- withholding of increment for a
period of six months without cumulative effect and Rs.1,50,000/-
withholding of increment for a period of six months without
cumulative effect has been imposed. The applicant preferred an
appeal dated 09.11.2023 (Annexure A-10, A-11 and A-12).
However, the same has not been decided.
2.
He further submits that this Original Application may be
disposed of with a direction to the competent authority of the
respondents to consider and decide the applicant’s appeal within a
time frame.
3.
Shri S.P. Singh, learned counsel for the respondents submits
that appeal preferred by the applicant on 09.11.2023 (Annexure A-
Page 3 of 3
3
10 to A-12), if not decided by the respondent No.4 the same shall
be considered and decided by the said authority within a
timeframe.
4.
In view of the above submissions made by learned counsel
for the parties, without going into the merits of the case, this
Original Application is disposed of with a direction to the competent
authority of the respondents to consider and decide the appeal
preferred by the applicant on 09.11.2023 (Annexure A-10 to A-12),
if not already decided, by a reasoned and speaking order, within a
period of 90 days from the date of communication of this order.
However, if the appeal is decided in favour of the applicant and if it
is found that applicant deserve the amount to be refunded then the
amount so recovered in the Head of ‘Fraud and Loss Rec.’ shall be
refunded to the applicant within a further period of three months.
(Kumar Rajesh Chandra) (Akhil Kumar Srivastava)
Administrative Member
Judicial Member
kg/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.