2023 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 1664
1
Item No. 42(C-3)
O.A. No. 2614/2017
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH: NEW DELHI
O.A. No. 2614/2017
This the 24th day of February, 2023
Hon’ble Mr. Ashish Kalia, Member (J)
Hon’ble Dr. Anand S. Khati, Member (A)
Shri Praveen Kumar,
S/o Shri Kanwar Pal Singh,
Aged 35 years,
Working as Sr. Comml Clerk,
(Group-C),
H/No. 2870, Sant Nagar,
Rani Bagh, New Delhi.
…Applicant
(By Advocate: Mr. Amit Anand)
Versus
Union of India & Others: Through
1.
The Secretary
Ministry of Railways,
Railway Board,
New Delhi.
2.
The General Manager,
Northern Railway,
Headquarter’s Office,
Baroda House,
New Delhi.
3.
The President,
Northern Railway Sports Authority(NRSA),
Headquarter’s office,
Baroda House,
New Delhi.
…Respondents
(By Advocate: None)
2
Item No. 42(C-3)
O.A. No. 2614/2017
Hon’ble Mr. Ashish Kalia, Member (J)
In the present OA, the applicant has prayed for the
following reliefs:-
“i.
That this Hon’ble Tribunal may graciously be
pleased to allow this Original application directing the
respondents to consider his case for retrospective out of
turn promotion of Sr. Comml Clerk alongwith Arrears of
Salary from when he achieved the 3rd Medal winning
performance as per Railway Board instruction with all
consequential benefits.
ii.
That this Hon’ble Tribunal may graciously be
pleased to directing the respondents to extend the
similar and identical benefit to the applicant which was
extended by the Hon’ble co-ordinate Chandigarh Bench
of this Tribunal in Shri Mandeep Singh (Athlete) case
and same benefits accorded by the respondents to Shri
Mandeep Singh on similar & identical circumstances.
iii.
That this Hon’ble Tribunal may graciously be
pleased to direct the respondents to produce all relevant
records before this Hon’ble Tribunal in the interest of
justice.
iv.
That any other or further relief which this Hon’ble
Tribunal may be deem fit and proper under the
circumstances of the case may also be granted in favour
of the applicants.
3
v.
That the cost of the proceedings may also be
awarded in favour to the applicants.”
This
matter
is
pending
since
long,
even
no
representation has been made on behalf of the respondents
on previous so may occasions. We are of this view that this
matter can be dealt with in the absence of the learned
counsel for the respondents.
Brief facts of the present OA are that the applicant
who was initially appointed as Commercial Clerk was
regularized on the said post on 28.02.2002 and entitled for
out of turn promotion to the post of Senior Commercial
Clerk w.e.f. 2005. He represented the Indian Railways in
the 42nd All India Open Athletic Championship, the 43rd
National Open Athletic Championship and the 45th National
Open Athletic Championship. It is submitted that as
regards out of turn promotion, the Railway Board vide
letter dated 30.03.2007 laid down under para 9.4.1 1(ii),
which reads as under:-
“(ii) Sports persons represented Indian Railway in the
National Championship on three occasions with medal
4
winning performance within a period of five year can be
considered for out of turn promotion.”
The applicant fulfilled all the condition mentioned in
the Railway Board instruction. Subsequently, he was
promoted as Senior Commercial Clerk on seniority basis on
07.09.2012 instead of due date i.e. in the year of 2005. The
case of the applicant was again put up to the competent
authority with the request to the competent authority to
accord the approval for out of turn promotion with effect
from the concluding day of the Championship where he has
achieved the 3rd medal winning performance for Indian
Railways and later again put up to the higher authority for
seeking the similar approval. The applicant preferred a
detailed representation dated 20.06.2017 requesting the
respondents to grant him out of turn promotion with
retrospective effect when he achieved the 3rd medal winning
performance with all consequential benefits but till date no
action has been taken so far. Being aggrieved, he has
approached this Tribunal seeking the aforementioned
reliefs.
5
4.
No representation on behalf of the respondents. Mr.
Amit Anand, learned counsel who appears on behalf of the
applicant submits that since the applicant has obtained
three consecutive medals in the national games, he is
entitled for out of turn promotion as referred in the clause
9.4.1 1(ii) of the Railway Board Policy.
5.
Notices were issued. Respondents put appearance and
filed counter affidavit admitted therein the receipt of the
medals won by the applicant but they also stated therein
that the first out of turn promotion cannot be granted to
him from the date of conclusion of event as he has already
got promotion in GP Rs. 2800/- of PB-1 (5200-20200) at
his own seniority with effect from 07.09.2012.
6.
The short issue put