SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 439

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
K V V Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
Ut Of Pondicherry – Respondent


ORDER

[Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr.P.Madhavan, Member(J)]

In short, the applicant's case is that he belongs to OBC ctegory and the respondents had issued a notification on 20.4.12 calling for applications for filling up of the post of UD Clerks and the applicant had applied for the said post and he was selected as Sl.No.1 of the OBC category. He had obtained 55.25 marks in the examination and the result was published on 01.10.2012. Eventhough the name of the applicant came up first in the select list, the respondents had not given any appointment to him. When he had enquired regarding his non-appointment, the respondents had orally informed that the applicant has not produced a proper Community Certificate. According to the applicant, he had produced a Community Certificate dt. 26.3.10 before the respondents but they have not accepted it.

According to the applicant, the said Community Certificate is valid till its cancellation by the competent authority. There is no reason to deny appointment to him. So he prays for a direction to the respondents to appoint him as UDC on the basis of rank list published on 01.10.12 with all consequential benefit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top