CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Dr Jayakumar T M – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
Per: Justice S.Sujatha ...........Member(J)
As 3RD MEMBER
In view of the dissenting orders passed by the Hon’ble
Members of this Tribunal in this matter, the Hon’ble Chairman has
nominated me as third member to hear the case. Hence, the matter has
been heard accordingly.
Union Public Service Commission,
…Respondents
for Respondent No.2)
...........Member(J)
MEMBER
In view of the dissenting orders passed by the Hon’ble
in this matter, the Hon’ble Chairman has
ember to hear the case. Hence, the matter has
2.
Administrati
(i)
or direction to quash the endorsement bearing No.CMSE
2019/R No.
Respondent No.2 (ANNEXURE
(ii)
or direction to second respondent consider the representation
dated 23.02.2021 submitted by the applicant vide (ANNEXURE
A13) by accepting the EWS cer
(iii)
consider the EWS certificate dated 06.02.2021 (ANNEXURE
A12) for financial year 2018
valid and allow the candidature of the applicant a
him.
(iv)
Rules in so far as it stipulates the date on or before 01.08.2019,
as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 16 of
Constitution of India.”
3
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.