ORDER

By Ramesh Singh Thakur, JM.

The applicant is aggrieved by the order dated 14.06.2010 (Annexure A-1) passed by the Disciplinary Authority imposing the punishment of compulsory retirement of service. He is also challenging the order dated 29.03.2011 (Annexure A-2) of the Appellate Authority, whereby his appeal against the said punishment order has been rejected.

2.

The applicant has sought for the following reliefs:

“8.(i) Summon the entire relevant record from the respondents for its kind perusal;

(ii) Set aside the order dated 14.06.2010 Annexure-A/1 and 29.03.2011 Annexure A/2.

(iii) Direct the respondents to reinstate the applicant with all consequential benefit as if the impugned orders are never passed.

(iv) Any other order/direction may also be passed.

(v) Award cost of the litigation to the applicant.”

3.

Brief facts of the case, as projected in the Original Application, are that the applicant was initially appointed on 06.03.1978 as Group-D employee in the Postal Department.

Thereafter, he was promoted as Postman on 07.07.1979 and Male Overseer on 07.04.1997. While working as Male Overseer, a chargesheet under Rule 14 of