Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. R.N. Singh, J, Mr. B.Anand, A
Manish Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
Indian Red Cross Society – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's employment and retirement order. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments against the validity of retirement order. (Para 3 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. legal framework for rule adoption. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 11 , 14) |
| 4. respondents' defense of rule adoption. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. past practices and implications of rule adoption. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 6. court's analysis of rule application. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 7. counterarguments and precedents. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 8. final ruling on the case. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. B.Anand, Member (A):
By way of the present O.A. filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant has sought the following relief(s):-
“(a) Quash and set aside the Office Order dated 03-02- 2024 bearing No.559 on the file F.No.A- 11016/24/P&A/347 issued by the Respondent and pass an order directing the Respondent to re-instate the Applicant forthwith and:
(b) Pass such order or other orders as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and render justice.”
2. The brief factual matrix of the case is that the applic
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
