SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 2875

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Asif Hamid Malik – Appellant
Versus
Home Department – Respondent


O R D E R

HON’BLE MR. D. S. MAHRA MEMBER (J)

01. Learned Counsel for the applicants has submitted that the present application has been filed by the applicants seeking relief against the inaction of the respondents in granting them the benefits of their appointment from the year 2009 and in wrongfully applying SRO 420 of 2009 to their services. He contended that their service conditions should be governed by the rules in effect before the issuance of SRO 420 of 2009, as they were appointed prior to its promulgation.

02. In the facts and circumstances, it is humbly prayed that the Hon'ble Tribunal may be graciously pleased to grant the following relief(s):

a) By issuance of an appropriate order, the respondents be directed to give effect to the appointment of the applicants from the year 2009.

b) By issuance of an appropriate order, it be declared that the services of the applicants are not governed by SRO 420 of 2009 dated 24th December 2009 and, in the matter of pension, their services are governed by the Pension Rules as applicable/in vogue prior to the issuance of SRO 420 of

2009 dated 24th December 2009.

c) That the respondents be directed to extend all consequential benefits to the a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top