SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 1698

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Raghunath Dash – Appellant
Versus
D/o Post – Respondent


O R D E R

Per Mr.Gokul Chandra Pati, Member (A)

The applicant has filed this OA seeking the following reliefs:-

“In view of the facts stated above, it is humbly prayed that Hon’ble Tribunal may be graciously be pleased to quash Annexure A/ 1 and A/ 10 and direct the respondents to release all the benefits with interest of 18% and impose exemplary cost and compensation and the same may be recovered from Respondent No.6 by other respondents for unnecessary harassing the applicant.

And any other order(s) as the Hon’ble Tribunal deems just and proper in the interest of justice.”

2. The facts of the case are that the applicant, while working as a Post Master at HSG-I grade, retired from service on 28.2.2003 and after his retirement, he was issued a charge-sheet dated 17.3.2005 (Annexure-1 to the OA) on charge that due to his negligence, a misappropriation to the extent of Rs. 12 lakh by one of his staff, Sri Apoorba Kumar Bisoi, Postal Assistant working under the applicant during January, 2003. The Inquiry Officer (in short IO) was appointed to inquire into the charges and he submitted the report on 24.11.2005 (Annexure-6 to the OA) to the respondent no. 5 who issued show cause notice to th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top