O R D E R (ORAL)

Mr. G. George Paracken, Member (J)

This Review Application has been filed by the respondents in OA No.1214/2011 which was decided on 02.04.2013. The operative part of the said order reads thus :-

“12. In view of the above position, this OA is allowed. Consequently, as prayed for by the Applicant, we direct the Respondents to regularize the period of put off duty as spent on duty for all purposes excluding payment of arrears of Time Related Continuity Allowance. Further, we quash and set aside the impugned Annexure A-1 order dated 29.03.2008 removing the Applicant from service and the Annexure A-2 order of the Appellate Authority dated 26.03.2010 rejecting his appeal with all consequential benefits. The Respondents shall, therefore, reinstate the Applicant in service, forthwith from the date he was put off duty with continuity in service. The aforesaid directions shall be complied with within a period of 2 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. ”

2. The respondents challenged the aforesaid order before the Hon‟ble High Court vide WP(C) No.6504/2013 and the learned counsel for petitioner (respondents in the OA) submitted before the High Court