O R D E R

1. This order disposes of the Review Application filed by the respondents seeking review of the order dated 12.10.2015 whereby O.A. No. 34/2012 titled Ram Naval v/s Union of India and others was disallowed.

2. In the O.A., it was held that the applicant was an unauthorized occupant of the railway quarter and railway is entitled to recover penal/damage rent for unauthorized occupation of the quarter from the applicant under rules.

3. The applicant seeks review of the order on the grounds:

1) Tribunal did not appreciate the law while deciding the O.A.;

2) Tribunal had held about the unauthorized occupancy of the applicant in the railway quarter which he had possessed at Kanpur;

3) Tribunal failed to examine the prayer for which the O.A.

was filed;

4) Applicant had filed the O.A. regarding excess of recovery being made and the rate by which the recovery had been made was also excess;

5) Tribunal overlooked the issue of impugned order dated

17.01.2011

4. I have considered the averments of the review application and gone through the material on record to see whether a case for review of the order is made out or not.

5. It is settled law that review jurisdiction is available only on the gr