CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Debabrata Mazumder – Appellant
Versus
Eastern Railway – Respondent
ORDER (Oral)
Per Mr. G. Raiasuri aJ.udici aMelmber:
Heard Ld. Counsel fo rboth sides.
2. This O.A. has been file sdeekin gthe followi nrgeliefs:-
"a. To set asid e and quash impugned offi ceorde r No.
EAC(1)/150/20 1d3ated 7.11.201 3as fa ras applica nits concerne d fo rtreati ntghe perio dfrom 28.12.201 1to 19.10.201 2as Leave Withou tPay (LWP).
b. To set asid eand quash impugned lett eNro. EAC(1)/Dy .
CTI/Misc./20 d0a8ted 10.9.201 i2ssue dby Sr. DPO, Easter nRailway , Howrah.
c. To direc tthe respondent tso regulari tshee sic kperio dof the applica nftrom 28.12.201 t1o 19.10.201 f2 ir sagtains tLAP and then agains tLHAP and pay salar yand allowance sfo rthe said period.
d. To direc tthe respondent sto trea tthe perio dfrom
07.12.201 2to 20.12.201 2where applica nwtas sic kunder RMC (Railwa Myedica lCertifica ats eLA)P and pay salar aynd allowance s fo rthe said period.
e. To direc tthe respondent tso pay intere @s t10% p.a .on the amount of salar yso paid.
f. Any othe rorde ror order( sa)s the Hon'bl eTribun adleems fi atnd proper”.-
3. The nitt yg,ritt tyh,e gis tand kerne lof the germane facts absolute lnyecessar yfo rdisposa olf thi sO.A. would run thus .The applica nwtas Deputy Chie fTick
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.