O R D E R

1. This order disposes of the Review Application filed by the respondents seeking review of the order dated 10.09.2015 whereby O.A. No. 595/2011 titled Dr. R.S.Prajapati v/s Union of India and others was allowed.

2. In the O.A., applicants were given the relief of being awarded interest on delayed payment of his retiral benefits by way of order dated 10.09.2015, of which the respondents (Union of India) seek a review.

3. The applicant seeks review of the order on the ground:

1) Because despite respondent pleading contributory negligence of applicant, interest @ 18 % is not sustainable;

2) Delay in payment of retiral benefits was not intentional or deliberate but occurred to inter-office correspondence;

3) If order not reviewed, it would raise multiplicity of un-

necessary litigation.

4. I have heard and considered the arguments of learned counsels for the parties and gone through the material on record.

5. It is settled law that review jurisdiction is available only on the grounds prescribed under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which contains only three grounds –

(i) mistake or error apparent on the face of record;

(ii) discovery of new and important matter or ev