CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Jamini Ranjan Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
Eastern Railway – Respondent
ORDER (Oral)
Per Mr. G. Raiasuri aJ.udici aMelmber:
!
Heard Ld. Counsel fo rboth sides.
I
2. This 0.A. has been file sdeekin gthe followi nrgeliefs •v■
"(a ) Cancellati aonnd/o rsetti nagsid eof the impugned orde r / Jp of Removal of the Applica nftrom servic edated lune 13, 2005 being Annexure "A-7" herein.
(b) As the applica nmteantime has reached to the age of superannuati osno, your Lordship msay gracious lbey kind enough to orde rthe concerne dresponden to pay the applica natl lhis arrea rpay and allowance sas per Railwa yServan tPay and Allowanc eRules wit heffec ftrom lune 13, 2015 by calculat ing therei tnhe due promotion osf the applica nwtit hdue increment s as per Rules ,which the applica nwtould had been entitl etod get i fthe applica nwtould not had illega bleleny removed from service;
(c) Order the respondent sto pay the applica natn intere st at the rat eof 18 percen tper annum upon on al lsuch calculat ed arrea rpay and allowanc eti lacltua lrealizat ioof nsuch amount.
(d) Your Lordship smay gracious lbye kind enough to orde r the responden tNo. 3 to gran tand pay pensio nto the applica nt by treati nthge applica nats i fhe was in servic te i hlisl date of sinc ethe date of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.