ORDER

Per RAJ VIR SHARMA, MEMBER(J):

We have perused the records, and have heard Mr.M.R.Farooqui, the learned counsel appearing for the applicants, and Mr.K.M.Singh, Ms.Anupama Bansal, Ms.Anita Pandey, and Mr.R.N.Singh, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

2. Respondent No.1-Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (DSSSB) issued an Advertisement No.004/2009 inviting applications from eligible persons for recruitment to different posts including the post of Teacher (Primary-Urdu) in Municipal Corporation of Delhi, vide Post Code 69/09. The closing date for receipt of applications was 15.1.2010. As per the Advertisement, age relaxation was admissible to ‘Departmental employees –

up to 42 years of age (general), up to 47 years from SC/ST, having 03 years continuous service in the same line or allied cadres’. In response to the Advertisement, the applicants made applications. On the basis of admit cards issued to them by respondent no.1-DSSSB, they appeared in the recruitment examination. On 1.3.2014 respondent no.1-DSSSB published the result of the selected candidates, and a list of candidates whose candidatures were rejected for various reasons mentioned therein. In the