Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
SUNIL THOMAS, J
Karimshah – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's entitlement to medical benefits. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claims for reimbursement based on submitted bills. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. essential facts not disputed. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. legal arguments regarding applicability of cs(ma) rules. (Para 7 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. interpretation of o.m. regarding medical rules. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 6. clarification of administrative responsibilities. (Para 12 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. court's view on the necessity of formal orders. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 8. right to medical aid as a legal issue. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 9. clarification on reimbursement rights. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 10. available options for pensioners in non-cghs areas. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 11. requirement of subscription for benefits. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 12. final decision on the applicant's claims. (Para 30 , 31) |
ORDER
The applicant retired from the service of Department of Posts as Sorting Assistant on 31.12.2002. After retirement, he is residing in a non- CGHS area. He opted for Fixed Medical Allowance (FMA for short) in lieu of outpatient CGHS treatment and was drawing Rs. 1,000/- per month. The Government by Annexure A1 OM dated 5.6.1998 has extended the benefits of CS(MA) Rules to pensioners residing in areas not cover
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
