CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Sudhi Ranjan Mishra, J, Mr. Pramod Kumar Das, ACJ
Prasanna Kumar Mishra – Appellant
Versus
East Coast Railway – Respondent
ORDER
Hon’bleMr.Pramod Kumar Das, A.M.
The applicant challenging the order dated 23.07.2020 & 29.04.2021 wherein his prayer for 3rd MACP has been rejected has filed this OA praying for following reliefs:
1. Admit the original application;
2. Call for the records
3. (a) Quash the impugned order dated 23.07.2020 & 29.04.2021 passed by the Respondent No. 2 under Annexures A/8 & A/9 respectively, and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and not sustainable in the eye of law being contrary to RBE No. 101/2009 dated 10.06.2009 and corresponding circular dated 29.12.2011 and dated 27.06.2014 and the judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Apex Court under Annexure A/10 series & Annexure A/11 respectively.
(b) Further the respondents be accordingly directed to extend the 3rd MACP scheme computing 30 (thirty) years of service of the applicant with effect from the date of initial appointment as ASM i.e. w.e.f. 01.08.1984 or as Traffic Apprentice w.e.f. 06.04.1990 (inclusive of training period) in terms of RBE No. 101/2009 and corresponding circular dated 29.12.2011 and dated 27.06.2014 and judgment rendered by Hon’ble Apex Court under Annexure A/10 series & Annexure A/11 respectively with all othe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.