SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 3575

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Manish Garg, Mr. Anindo Majumdar, JJ
Subrata Roy – Appellant
Versus
S E Railway – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. C Sinha; Ms. E Banerjee

ORDER (ORAL)

Per: Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, (J):

1. Ld Counsel for both the parties are present.

2. Heard.

3. The applicant has approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, praying for the following relief(s):-

“a) To set aside and quash Impugned letter No.SER/P-HQ/T/CC/CAT/OA No.283 of 2019/SR dated 15.04.2019 issued by Principal Chief Personnel Officer, South Eastern Railway, Garden Reach.

b) To set aside and quash Impugned Estt. Srl. No. 67/2017 dated 16.05.17 issued by Sr. Personnel Officer (HQ) for Chief Personnel Officer, South Eastern Railway.

c) To set aside and quash Impugned Order No. PC-V/2009/MCP/9/Sr dated 18.04.2016 issued by Dy. Director, Pay Commission (V), Railway Board.

d) To direct the respondents to allow the applicant to enjoy the Financial Upgradation under MACP Scheme in Grade Pay of Rs.4200/- w.e.f. 01.09.2008 as granted to him vide Office Order No.14 of 2015 dated 08.09.2015.

e) To direct the respondents not to make any recovery from the applicant and to refund any amount if already recovered f) Any other order or orders as the Hon'ble Tribunal deems fit and proper.”

4. Ld Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top