CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
R. N. Singh, J, Rajinder Kashyap, A
Dharam Pal Kherwa – Appellant
Versus
M/o Communications – Respondent
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A):-
By way of the present OA filed u/s 19 of the AT Act, 1985, the applicant, in para 8 of the OA has prayed for the following reliefs: -
“(a) To issue appropriate order/direction to quash the impugned order dated 06.09.2016.
(b) To restore his pension and further to direct the respondents to pay his gratuity and pension with 20% interest with compound interest form due date till payment.
(c) To pass such other or further order/s as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts of the case.”
FACTS OF THE CASE
2. The applicant, who joined service on 01.09.1969, became eligible for full pension on 01.09.1999 but continued working until his retirement on 31.05.2008. Despite his conviction on 14.06.2010, he was paid full provisional pension until 31.08.2016. No action was taken against him until 12.05.2015, when a memorandum notice was issued under Rule 9 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 . However, year 2014 was written on the memorandum instead of year 2015 inadvertently therefore, on pointing out of the aforesaid mistake Asstt. Director General (Vig-II) rectified the year from 2014 to 2015 and has intimated to consider the memorandu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.