Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
S. Sujatha, J, Sanjiv Kumar, A
B.M. Ramachandra – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of misconduct addressed through inquiry procedure under ccs (cca) rules. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding evidence and the lack of clarity in charges brought forward. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court affirms the competency of disciplinary authority despite applicant's objections to procedure. (Para 7 , 20 , 22) |
| 4. final dismissal of the oa as lacking merit. (Para 24) |
ORDER
PER: JUSTICE S. SUJATHA, MEMBER (J)
This application is filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs:
“(a) Call for records of the case from the respondents and on perusal
(b) this Hon’ble Tribunal be pleased to quash and set aside the Order bearing C. No. II/10A/03/2017 A3 Vig B North dated 30.07.2020 (Annexure-A8) passed by second respondent and Order in Appeal No. 03/2021 (Vig) in File No. C/II/26/55/2019-Vig. PCC CT (BZU) dated 1.6.2021 (Annexure-A11) passed third respondent.
(c) Issue a consequential direction to the respondents to restore the pay of the applicant at the stage which prevailed on the date of imposition of penalty order with a further direction to draw and disburse the pay and other allowances at the original ra
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
