Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajveer Singh Verma, J, Kumar Rajesh Chandra, A
Purna Chandra Kahili – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's appointment and qualifications. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. judgment affecting applicant's qualifications. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. respondents' arguments regarding the applicant's degree. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. committee's findings and interpretations. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. applicant's rebuttals and claims. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. court's observations on natural justice. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 7. interpretation of recruitment rules. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 8. court's conclusion on educational requirements. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 9. final decision regarding applicant's case. (Para 47) |
| 10. order of the tribunal. (Para 48) |
ORDER
PER:RAJVEER SINGH VERMA, MEMBER[JUDICIAL]
1. Applicant has filed present OA under section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking following reliefs:-
“(i) Call for the records of the case.
(ii) Quash and set aside the impugned order dated 27/06/2024 at Annexure A-1.
(iii) Direct the Respondents to give all consequential benefits to the applicant.
(iv) Pass any other order or direction which this Hon’ble Tribunal thinks fit and proper in the light of the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
