Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
MRS. RASHMI SAXENA SAHNI, A
Raghubir Singh, EE (Retd) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant seeks leave encashment payment. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents argue withholding payment based on rules. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court reviews precedents on leave encashment. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. court orders release of withheld leave encashment. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. o.a. is allowed; no costs ordered. (Para 16) |
ORDER (ORAL)
PER: MRS. RASHMI SAXENA SAHNI, MEMBER (A)
1. Present original application has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking following relief:-
(i) Direct the Respondents to release payment of leave salary on account of leave encashment for 300 days accumulated by the applicant during service.
(ii) Direct the Respondents to grant interest @ 12% until the said amount on account of leave encashment is paid/credited to the Applicants’ Pension Account.
2. Brief facts of the case, as pleaded by the applicant, are that applicant was appointed as Superintendent Building & Roads Grade II in Military Engineer Services and later post was re- designated as Junior Engineer (Civil) vide MOD letter dated 09.07.1999. He was promoted as Assistant Engineer (Civil) on 25.07.2003 and to the grade of Execu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
