Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Kumar Rajesh Chandra, AM, Rajveer Singh Verma, J
Hem Chand – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through the Cabinet Secretary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of disciplinary actions against the applicant (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by the applicant and respondents (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis on the interpretation of judicial proceedings (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. final decision to dismiss the application (Para 21) |
Per Kumar Rajesh Chandra, A.M. :- Instant OA has been filed by tthhee aapppplliiccaanntt sseeeekkiinngg tthhee ffoolllloowwiinngg rreelliieeff::-
(B) Further staying the operation of the Order dated 17.01.2019, passed by the Union of India along with memorandum dated 16.01.2018 and the UPSC’s advice dated 28.12.2018, until the final adjudication of the instant OA.
2. Brief facts of the case, as per the applicant, are that applicant joined the IPS in 1971 in West Bengal Cadre and served in the State till April, 1989. He was then appointed as Chief Vigilance Officer (CVO) of Central Coalfields Limited, Ranchi on deputation and subsequently he was re-designated as Executive Director (Vigilance).
2.2 In December, 1992 CBI wrongfully instituted another fabricated case bearing no. RC 23(A) of 1992 in the Special Court at Ranchi for the purposes o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
