Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rameshwar Vyas, J
Smt. Sajida Bano – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through General Manager, North Western Railway, Jaipur Zone, Jaipur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's claim for family pension after husband's death. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent's objection regarding succession certificate requirement. (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis on family pension rights under muslim personal law. (Para 4 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. order to grant family pension without succession certificate. (Para 9) |
ORDER (Oral)
1. Applicant is aggrieved by non-grant of family pension to her after death of her husband, who retired w.e.f. 11.04.2008 from the post of Loco Pilot Goods in the Railways.
2.1 Sharif Mohammad served the railways from 20.04.1977 to 11.04.2008. While working on the post of Loco Pilot Goods in the office of Senior Section Engineer (Loco), NWR, Churu he retired voluntarily w.e.f. 11.04.2008. After his retirement, PPO dated 24.03.2009 (Annexure A/2) was issued in his favour wherein no one was shown as entitled to get family pension. Unfortunately, Sharif Mohammad died on 13.10.2015 as mentioned in death certificate Annexure A/3. After his death, the applicant as well as private respondent no.3 Smt. Amna Khatoon claimed a family pension showing themselves as the wife of the deceased railway employee. Record reveals that the issue of grant of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
