Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Shri Jayesh V Bhairavia, Hon’ble Dr. Hukum Singh Meena, JJ
Shri Malkit V. Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. pre-charge factual history and recruitment process (Para 2) |
| 2. applicant's contentions and procedural arguments (Para 3) |
| 3. respondents' contentions and defense of charge (Para 4) |
| 4. court's analysis: cfsl handwriting evidence requires corroboration; denial of natural justice issues; reliance on precedents (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. final order: oa allowed; charge memo quashed; no costs (Para 13 , 14) |
ORDER
Per: Hon’ble Shri Jayesh V. Bhairavia, Member (J)
The instant OA has been filed by the applicant under section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act seeking following reliefs:-
“8
(A) Quashing and setting aside the charge memorandum dated 22/23/06.2020 at Annexure A/1,
(B) Permanently restraining the respondents from proceeding with the pending inquiry initiated against the applicant pursuant to the charge memorandum dated 22/23.06.2020 in view of the order passed by this Hon’ble Tribunal in OA No. 223/2019, order dated 08.04.2022 passed by Hon’ble Principal Bench in OA No. 435 of 2021 as well as the judgment passed by Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad in Writ Application No. 2813 of 2017 and other allied matters, and
(C) Passing any other appropriate order.
2
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
