Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Jayesh V Bhairavia, J, Dr. Hukum Singh Meena, A
Neha Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the charge memorandum process was initiated based on the applicant's previous examination participation and subsequent alleged irregularities. (Para 2) |
| 2. the respondents' actions are challenged primarily based on evidence from handwriting specialists. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court notes violations of natural justice regarding the non-provision of defense documents. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. expert opinion is insufficient alone to substantiate charges without corroborative evidence. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. the tribunal quashed the charge memorandum due to procedural irregularities and insufficiencies in the evidence. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
ORDER
Per: Hon’ble Shri Jayesh V. Bhairavia, Member (J)
The instant OA has been filed by the applicant under section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act seeking following reliefs:-
(A) Quashing and setting aside the charge memorandum dated 27.05.2020 at Annexure A/1,
(B) Permanently restraining the respondents from proceeding with the pending inquiry initiated against the applicant pursuant to the charge memorandum dated 27.05.2020 in view of the order passed by this Hon’ble Tribunal in OA No. 223/2019, order dated 08.04.2022 passed by Hon’ble Principa
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
