Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
SHRI SUDHI RANJAN MISHRA, J, SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR DAS, A
Dr. Manoj Kumar Das – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. context of the applicant's service and claim for pension. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding entitlements based on ad hoc service. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's rationale regarding equitable treatment for pension benefits. (Para 5 , 12) |
| 4. legal backing for recognizing service duration. (Para 11) |
| 5. final ruling allowing the applicant's claim. (Para 13) |
ORDER
PRAMOD KUMAR DAS, MEMBER (A):
The prayer of the applicant in this OA is to direct the Respondents to count his service from 04.01.1988 to 15.03.2007 rendered in National Institute of Medical Research (NIMR) under the Integrated Disease Vector Control (IDVC) project as qualifying service for all purposes viz pension and other pensionary benefits by quashing the order dated 26.04.2019 wherein the Respondents rejected his representation.
2. According to Applicant, on 04.01.1988, on being selected through an open advertisement, he was appointed purely on temporary and ad hoc basis as a Technical Officer in the IDVC Project under Malaria Research Centre, NIMR in the pay scale of Rs. 2000-3200/- and posted at Berhampur Field Unit in Odisha. Thereafter, on 21.06.1988, he was transferred and posted at Rourkela Field Unit and, o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
