Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Manish Garg, J
Virender Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India Through the General Manager, Northern Railway – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of applicant's claims and basis for pension entitlements. (Para 2) |
| 2. opposition arguments against applicant's claims and their justifications. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court observations on legal precedents regarding pension as property. (Para 5 , 6) |
ORDER
By Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J):
In the present Original Application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant seeks the following reliefs:-
“(i) That the Hon'ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to pass of an order declaring to the effect that action of the respondents not considering and not finalizing the case of the applicant for placing him in old pension scheme is illegal, arbitrary and against the rules and consequently, pass an order directing the respondents to place the applicant in old pension scheme under Rly. Servant (Pension)Rules, 1993 after counting 50% of casual service of the applicant with all the consequential benefits.
(ii) That the Hon'ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to pass an order directing the to treat the applicant regularly appointed from 1998 at par with his junior as per the undertaking given by the respondents before the Hon'ble Tr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
