Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M.S. LATIF: J
Nargis – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of J&K through Commissioner Secretary to Government, Health Department, Civil Secretariat, Srinagar/Jammu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for setting aside suspension order based on false allegations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. argument about the necessity and process of reviewing the suspension. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court refers to established law requiring timely reviews of employee suspensions. (Para 7) |
| 4. final ruling directing review of the suspension order in compliance with legal obligations. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
ORDER (Oral)
Per Hon’ble Mr. M.S. Latif, Member (Judl.):- Through the medium of the instant O.A., the applicant seeks setting aside of suspension order bearing no. BMOM/988-89 dated 04-01-2020 or, in the alternative, seeking review of suspension order and the applicant be paid full salary along with the arrears.
2. The case of the applicant is that the applicant is working in respondent department as an AYA and is presently posted at SDH Magam. It is further stated that an FIR no. 01/2020 u/S 370 12B IPC was registered against the applicant at PS Magam on false allegations, leading to the applicant’s custody for more than 48 hours. Consequently, the applicant was placed under suspension by respondent no. 4 i.e. Block Medical Officer, Magam, vide order dated 04-01-2020.
3. Learned counsel
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
