Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M.G. SEWLIKAR, J, MR. SANTOSH MEHRA, A
Snehal D/o Vasantrao Patil – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of recruitment rules and age relaxation request. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. issues pertaining to administrative instructions related to age relaxation. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's final decision regarding the dismissal of the application. (Para 18) |
ORDER
Per : Shri Justice M.G. Sewlikar, Member (J)
Heard the learned counsel for the respondents.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant has placed on record written notes of argument.
3. The Applicant has filed this OA seeking following reliefs:
“8.A Quash and set aside the Communication/Order dt. 12/10/2020 passed by Respondent No.2 thereby rejecting the request of the relaxing age limit for the Applicant from 30 to 32 years to facilitate her to appear for the post of Asst. Director in the Ministry of Tourism.
8.B Direct the Respondent No.2 to accept the application form of the Applicant via online/offline mode by granting her one-time age limit relaxation to appear for the exam for the post of Asst. Director.
8.C Any other reliefs deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case may kindly be granted.
8.D Allow the O.A. with Cost”.
4. Facts lie in narrow compass.
4.1. The applicant is working as Tourist Information Officer, India
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
