Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Kumar Rajesh Chandra, A.M., Rajveer Singh Verma, J.
Satyendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's challenges against compulsory retirement and procedural claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. discussion of applicant's misconduct and the subsequent departmental actions. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's evaluation of the retirement decision against administrative standards. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. conclusion on the merit of the applicant's challenges. (Para 14) |
ORDER
Per Kumar Rajesh Chandra, A.M. :-
This OA has been filed by the applicant seeking the following relief:-
“(i) To quash and set aside the appellate order No. JH/RO/RNC/ADM-I/56J/456/18111 dated 10.08.2022 wherein the Respondent No. 3 acting as an appropriate/appointing authority has upheld the order of premature retirement while deciding the representation against premature retirement of the applicant.
(ii) To quash and set aside the Office Order No. 325 dated 05.03.2021 whereby the applicant was prematurely retired and relieved from services as per Fundamental Rule 56(J).
(iii) To quash and set aside the notice being No. JH/RO/RNC/ADM-I/FR 56J/2018/18111 dated 01.12.2020 whereby and whereunder he was informed that he shall be retired at the lapse of 3 months from the date of the notice
(iv) To
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
