2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 4356
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Justice S. Sujatha, J, Dr. Sanjiv Kumar, A
Sri B.N. Arunkumar – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
O.A./39/2025
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri A. Vishwanath Bhat
For the Respondents: Shri Vishnu Bhat
The court upheld that reversion without due notice violates principles of natural justice.
Headnote:The application was filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking relief against a reversion order issued by Respondent No.3. The applicant argued that his reversion was unlawful without a show cause notice, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The court found that the absence of a notice constituted a breach of fundamental principles of justice. The impugned order was quashed, and the matter was restored for reconsideration, upholding all rights and contentions of the parties.
O R D E R (ORAL)
PER: JUSTICE S. SUJATHA, MEMBER (J)
Though the matter is listed for orders, with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for both the parties, the matter is taken for final hearing.
2. This application is filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985 seeking the following reliefs:
“a. Issue a writ of certiorari or any appropriate order or direction to quash the order bearing No. GCCO/II/PROM/10/2024-ESTT-O/o Pr CC-CGST-ZONE- BENGALURU dated 09.01.2025 issued by Respondent No.3 vide Annexure-A12.
b. Issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to grant all the consequential benefit consequent upon quashing the order dated 09.01.2025 in the interest of justice and equity.
c. Pass such other order as this Hon’ble Tribunal deems fit and proper to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case including the cost of this Petition, in the interest of justice and equity.”
kavya shree k kavya CAT, Bangalore
3. Briefly stated the facts as narrated by the applicant are that the applicant is a Basketball player. Pursuant to the recruitment notification issued by the 3rd respondent inviting applications for recruitment of eligible candidates under sports quota to the cadre of Upper Division Clerk (UDC) and Lower Division Clerk (LDC), the applicant participated but was not selected. Being aggrieved, the applicant preferred OA No. 963/2002 before this Tribunal which came to be dismissed, against which, the applicant preferred Writ Petition No. 54092/2003 before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru. The Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka vide judgment dated 31.12.2010 was pleased to allow the said Writ Petition setting aside the order passed by this Tribunal dated 06.10.2003 in OA No. 963/2002 and directed the respondents to complete the formalities of appointment and appoint the applicant to the post for which application was made within four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the said order. The respondents challenged the said order of the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka unsuccessfully before the Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP No. 6620/2012, subsequent to which, the applicant was appointed as Tax Assistant vide order dated 23.04.2015 issued by the Respondent No.
kavya shree k kavya CAT, Bangalore
3. Accordingly, the applicant reported for duty on 01.05.2015 and is rendering his services attached to the post of Tax Assistant.
4. Pursuant to the representations submitted by the applicant requesting to grant him seniority with effect from 11.07.2002, the applicant was granted notional seniority with effect from 11.07.2002 in the grade of UDC vide order dated 01.02.2016. The seniority of the applicant was fixed over and above Shri P.S. Prakash on the basis of the direction of the 2nd respondent. The applicant was promoted to the post of Senior Tax Assistant vide order dated 25.06.2018 issued by the Respondent No. 3 notionally with effect from 01.10.2006. Subsequently, the applicant was granted promotion to the cadre of Inspector notionally with effect from 31.12.2009 vide order dated 31.08.2018 issued by the Respondent No. 3, as such, the applicant reported for duty to the post of Superintendent of Central Tax, Central Excise and Customs and has been discharging his duties. When things stood thus, Respondent No. 3 by issuing the order dated 09.01.2025 reverted the applicant from the cadre of Superintendent of Central Tax and Customs to the cadre of Inspector and consequently to the lower cadre of STA (Executive Assistant). Being aggrieved, the applicant has preferred this OA.
kavya shree k kavya CAT, Bangalore
5. Learned counsel Shri A. Vishwanath Bhat representing the applicant submitted that the impugned order dated 09.01.2025 issued by Respondent No. 3 vide Annexure-A12 results in reversion of the applicant from the cadre of Superintendent to the cadre of Executive Assistant (Senior Tax Assistant) and postponing his date of appointment to the cad