SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 4517

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
MS. VEENA KOTHAVALE, J, MR. SISIR KUMAR RATHO, A
Bhuvaneswari vs


Advocates:
M/s. A. R. Nixon, Mr. M. Kishore Kumar, SPC, M/s. N. Umapathi

ORDER

(Hon'ble Ms. Veena Kothavale, Member(J)

The relief sought in this OA is for a declaration that the applicants are entitled for LTC, Medical reimbursement and educational expenses eligible to 3rd Respondent and consequentially direct the respondents 1 and 2 to restore the name of minor applicants, Vigneswari and Veera Hari Prakash in the service register of Veeragurunathan, the 3rd Respondent.

2. The applicants being minors are represented by their natural guardian mother, Bhuvaneshwari and have filed this OA challenging the action taken by the 1st & 2nd Respondents in removing their names from the service register of their father, Veeragurunathan, the 3rd Respondent herein, who is working in the 1st & 2n Respondent's Department as Scientist.

3. From the facts stated by the applicants and 3rd respondent, it appears that the father and mother of the minor applicants have been divorced and both have been remarried. After his remarriage, the third respondent has submitted an application for revised nominations by removing of the names of his divorced wife and children and for inclusion of the names of his present wife and step children for LTC and medical reimbursement purposes. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top