Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ms. Harvinder Kaur Oberoi, J, Dr. Sumeet Jerath, A
Manish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India Through Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of the oa for appointment dispute. (Para 1) |
| 2. background of the applicant's appointment. (Para 2) |
| 3. arguments raised concerning cancellation. (Para 4) |
| 4. legal principles affecting appointment assessments. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. court's conclusion on arbitrary actions. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 6. outcome of the oa - allowed. (Para 9) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Dr. Sumeet Jerath, Member (A)
The instant OA has been filed by the applicant, Mr. Manish Kumar under Section 19 of the CAT Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs :-
"8 (i) To set aside and quash the impugned memorandum containing withdrawal of the offer of appointment by the Respondent No.2/CBI dated 14.03.2016.
(ii) To set aside and quash the impugned memorandum/letter dated 02.06.016 sent to the Under Secretary (NR), Staff Selection Commission, returning the Dossier of the Applicant/Petitioner along with his attestation form while cancelling the appointment of the Applicant/Petitioner for the post Sub-Inspector in CBI with reference to the letter No.2/1/2014- ND-1 dated 06.10.2015 of the Staff Selection Commission.
(ⅲ) To direct the Respondents to appoint the Applicant as Sub Inspector, CBI selected through SSC CGLE-14 at the serial No
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
