Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Shri Santosh Mehra, A, Shri Justice M.G. Sewlikar, J
Shri. Milind Hanumant Shinde – Appellant
Versus
The General Manager, Central Railway – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the applicant's suspension and conviction relevant to proceedings. (Para 2) |
| 2. respondents' arguments against the applicant's reinstatement. (Para 3) |
| 3. discussion on legal grounds and past judgments. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. judicial inquiry on the implications of the applicant's criminal case and the disciplinary action taken. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. final ruling on the appropriateness of disciplinary actions taken. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. conclusion of judgment affirming dismissal of the oa. (Para 18 , 19) |
ORDER
Per: Santosh Mehra, Member (A)
By this application, the applicant is seeking the following reliefs:
“8.1 To call for the records and proceedings of the case and quash and set aside the impugned orders No.SUR/C/D&A/565/MHS/BC/D/11 dated 16.04.2021 (Annexure A-1) passed by he Revision Authority No.SUR/C/D&A/565/MHS/BC//11 dated 24.11.2020 passed by the Appellate Authority (Annexue A-2), and penalty order No.SUR /C/ D&A/565/MHS/BC/DD/11 dated 08.03.2013 passed by the Disciplinary Authority (Annexure A-3).
8.2 To declare that the applicant is entitled to be reinstated into Railway service and treated as if not suspended and not removed from ser
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
