Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Manish Garg, J, Dr. Anand S Khati, A
Rakesh Kumar, Parveen Kumar, Satyavir Singh, Ishwar Singh, Bishamber Dayal, Naveen, Monu, Sunil Kumar, Yogender Kumar, Sandeep Kumar, Jitender, Pradeep Kumar, Suresh Kumar, Chhuttan Lai, Jagpal, Dileep Kumar, Ramesh Kumar, Hemant, Deep Chand, Ramesh Lai, Alam, Ishwar Singh, Pawan, Sandeep – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through the General Manager, Northern Railway, Baroda House, New Delhi – Respondent
ORDER (ORAL)
By Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)
In the present Original Application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985, the applicant seeks the following reliefs:-
“(i)That the Hon’ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to pass an order of quashing the impugned order dated 27.10.2018 (Annex.A/1) declaring to the effect that the action of the respondents preparing 12 hours per day/75 hours weekly roaster for the applicant who is working as Gateman is illegal, arbitrary, against the rules and consequently pass an order directing the respondents to prepare 8 hours per day/48 hours weekly roaster for the Gatemen.
(ii) That the Hon’ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to pass an order directing the respondents to grant of over time allowances to the applicant for 4 hours over time daily from the date of posting of the applicant as Gateman with all the consequential benefits including the arrear of over time allowances with interest.
(iii) Any other relief which the Hon’ble Tribunal deem fit and proper may also be granted to the applicant along with the costs of litigation.”
2. Learned counsel for the applicants takes us through the brief history and back
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
