Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Akhil Kumar Srivastava, JM, Kumar Rajesh Chandra, AM
Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Communication, Department of Posts – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Kumar Kori – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review application submitted for earlier decision on grounds of supreme court directives. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. delay applications must adhere to prescribed limits and valid justifications. (Para 4 , 5 , 7) |
| 3. review powers are limited, focusing on errors apparent from the record. (Para 6 , 8 , 9 , 12) |
| 4. no appeal mechanism through review; correction of clear errors only. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. review and delay applications dismissed after consideration of legal standards. (Para 13) |
By Akhil Kumar Srivastava, JM.-
This Review Application has been filed by the applicants (respondents in OA) seeking review of the order dated 16.05.2024, passed in Original Application No.89/2024 relying upon the interim order of Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 06.09.2024 passed in MA Diary No. 2400/2024 in SLP (C) No. 4722/2021.
2. From perusal of the order under review, it is found that the aforesaid OA No.89/2024 was allowed in the light of judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 11.04.2023 passed in Civil Appeal No. 2471/2023 — Director (Admn. And HR) KPTCL & Ors. C.P. Mundinamani & Ors was disposed of.
3. The Review Application against the order dated 16.05.2024 has been filed on 13.01.2025 i.e.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
