SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 5025

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Akhil Kumar Srivastava, JM, Kumar Rajesh Chandra, AM
Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Communication, Department of Posts – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Kumar Kori – Respondent


By Akhil Kumar Srivastava, JM.-

This Review Application has been filed by the applicants (respondents in OA) seeking review of the order dated 16.05.2024, passed in Original Application No.89/2024 relying upon the interim order of Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 06.09.2024 passed in MA Diary No. 2400/2024 in SLP (C) No. 4722/2021.

2. From perusal of the order under review, it is found that the aforesaid OA No.89/2024 was allowed in the light of judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 11.04.2023 passed in Civil Appeal No. 2471/2023 — Director (Admn. And HR) KPTCL & Ors. C.P. Mundinamani & Ors was disposed of.

3. The Review Application against the order dated 16.05.2024 has been filed on 13.01.2025 i.e. after more than seven months, for which a delay condonation application no. 55/2025 has been filed with prayer to condone the delay mainly on ground that after the order of the Tribunal dated 07.12.2023 was received in the office of the applicant, the department has proceeded to comply with the directions but in the meantime, Hon’ble Supreme Court has passed the order dated 06.09.2024 in MA No. 2400/2024 with specific guidelines. Hence, it is stated that there is no deliberate delay on the p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top