Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. R. N. Singh, J, Mr. B. Anand, A
Jugbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the applicant sought relief under relevant administrative procedures. (Para 1) |
| 2. applicant's absence was evaluated leading to disciplinary proceedings. (Para 2) |
| 3. arguments presented on mischaracterization of absence as willful misconduct. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. court emphasized the importance of proper context and process in disciplinary actions. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. final observations on appropriateness of disciplinary penalties. (Para 12 , 13) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. B. Anand, Member (A):-
1. In the present Original Application, filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 , the applicant has sought the following relief(s):
“(a) Quash and set aside the impugned orders dated 23.04.2019 and 25.01.2019 (Annexure A/1) and (Annexure A/2) respectively along with the impugned enquiry report (Annexure A/3).
(b) Direct the respondents to reinstate the applicant forthwith and
(c) Accord all consequential benefits.
(d) In the event it is found that the applicant is not entitled to the reliefs prayed above, the respondents be directed to consider and grant compassionate allowance to the applicant in terms of Rule 41 CCS (Pension) Rules and as per the law laid down by
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
