Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Manish Garg, J, Dr. Anand S Khati, A
Smt. Sushila – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India Through its Secretary, Ministry of Communication – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's claim for family pension. (Para 2) |
| 2. dismissal order against deceased is illegal. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. legal precedents support the applicant's claim. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. respondents' actions deemed unjustified. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. court orders to quash dismissal and grant benefits. (Para 11) |
ORDER (ORAL)
In the present Original Application, filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant has prayed for the following relief(s):
(b) Direct the respondents to sanction and grant family pension to the applicant wef 14/11/2004 i.e. the date the husband of the applicant has been presumed to be dead and release all other terminal benefits of her husband such as amount of GPF, CGEIS claim, leave encashment, gratuity and pay and allowances if any etc along with interest @ 18% p.a. till payment.
(d) Award Cost”
After 7 years of the missing of Mange Ram Khatri, the son of the deceased Govt. employee submitted an application to the SDM, Narela, Delhi for issue of Death Certificate. The Executive Magistrate, Narela, Delhi, after being satisfied with the Bailiff report and Police report etc issued an order dated 30.12.2011 to the Zonal Health Of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
