SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 5126

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Manish Garg, J, Dr. Sumeet Jerath, A
Lovkush Ravi – Appellant
Versus
Northern Railway – Respondent


Advocates:
Dr. Krishan Mahajan, Ms. Anu Singh

ORDER

Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J) :

In the present OA filed under Section – 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:

“(a) Quash and set aside the impugned result concerning the post of Senior Clerk and Typist advertised for the GDCE. Competitive Examination Notification No. 01/2020/GDCE of the respondent;

(b) Direct the respondent to seek the report of the Nodal Officer, mandated by the Supreme Court in Union of India vs National Federation of the Blind as to compliance by the respondent of S.34 of the RPWD Act 2016 and its rules concerning the impugned exam.

(c) Direct the respondent to hold a legal and proper exam as well as the typing test to fill in the 73 vacancies of Senior Clerk cum Typist after declaring the vacancies reserved for the disabled on the actual basis of their roster.

(d) Typist.

(e) Accord all consequential benefits

(f) Award costs of the proceedings; and

(g) Pass any order/relief/direction(s) as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the interests of justice in favour of the applicant.”

2. Highlighting the facts of the case, learned counsel for the applicant submitted as under:

2.1. The applicant,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top