ORDER

Shri Anil Kumar Singh, counsel for the applicants and Shri Raghvendra Pratap Singh, counsel for the respondents are present and heard.

2. This O.A. has been filed by the applicants against the impugned transfer order dated 19.07.2017 passed by the respondent No. 3. The applicants have also challenged the relieving order dated 18.08.2017. This Tribunal vide Order dated 29.08.2017 restrained the respondents to give effect the aforesaid transfer order and relieving order. Till today, the interim order has been continuing.

3. This case is listed today under the heading ‘final hearing’. Counsels for the parties have been heard.

4. Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that by the afflux of time, the status of the applicants has been changed. He further submitted that the applicant No. 1-Anjali Dayal has joined at the place of transfer and she does not want to pursue further this O.A. Hence, with respect to applicant No. 1, the O.A. has become infructuous. Regarding applicant No. 2, the applicants’ counsel has submitted that he has retired, as such, against the applicant No. 2, the O.A. has become infructuous. The name of applicant No. 3 was already deleted in compliance of