SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 7065

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
C Jayanthi – Appellant
Versus
Revenue – Respondent


ORDER (ORAL)

PER: RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA, MEMBER (A)

1. The applicant has filed the present Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs:

a) To quash the Order No: 05/2016 vide C. No. lI/39/09/2009 A.3 B-III B-V Pt file dated 29-12-2016 issued by the Disciplinary Authority imposing a major penalty on the applicant of “reduction by 11 stages in the time scale of pay for 3 years, with a further direction that she will not earn increments during the period of reduction, and the reduction will have the effect of postponing her future increments”.

b) To quash the Order No.5/2018 vide C. No. II/ 10A/ 01/ 2017/ C.C.CEX. (BZ) dated 18-12-2018 of the Appellate Authority vide which the penalty imposed by the Disciplinary Authority has been reduced to “reduction by 3 stages in the time scale of pay for three years with a further direction that she will not earn increments during the period of reduction, and the reduction will have the effect of postponing her future increments”.

c) To direct the respondents to restore the pay and grade of the applicant and pay her all arrears of salary and other benefits and pass such other order or orde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top