Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
K. Haripal, Judicial Member, K. V. Eapen, Administrative Member
N. Surendra – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants claim seniority from ad hoc promotion date. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. ldce quota promotion effective from result publication. (Para 4 , 5 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. seniority-cum-fitness stream regularization from 2009. (Para 6 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. 50% promotion, 50% ldce recruitment rules. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. ad hoc promotion does not confer seniority. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. seniority reckoned from regular ldce appointment date. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 25) |
| 7. applicants excluded from draft seniority list. (Para 24 , 26) |
ORDER
Justice K. Haripal, Judicial Member
Applicants had started as Junior Engineers in 2000 in the Postal Civil Wing of the Engineering Branch. On the basis of the decision of the DPC held on 06.07.2009 they along with some other Junior Engineers were promoted as Assistant Engineers with effect from 08.07.2009 on adhoc basis, for a period of 11 months. According to the applicants, their adhoc appointment continued uninterrupted and atlast they were promoted as regular Assistant Engineers on 02.06.2020. The precise claim of the applicants is that they are working as Assistant Engineers from 08.07.2009 un- interuptedly and continously without any break, for more th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
