Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Lata Baswaraj Patne, Judicial Member
R. Anjanalah – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. casual labours claim minimum wages per vii cpc. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents deny regular status, cite casual engagement. (Para 4 , 9) |
| 3. direct extension of benefits per implemented precedent. (Para 5 , 13) |
| 4. prior orders mandate equal treatment for similar labours. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 11 , 12) |
ORDER
(As per Hon’ble Dr. Lata Baswaraj Patne, Judicial Member)
By this OA, the applicants are seeking the following relief:
“……..declare the action of the respondents I not implementing the office order dated 26.12.2016 with regard to payment of the minimum wages to the casual labours with 1/30th status (i.e.Rs.18,000/- + Darness Allowance) as per the recommendations of the VII Central Pay Commission is illegal, arbitrary and violative of article 14& 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay the minimum wages of Rs.18,000/- + dearness allowance every month as per the recommendation of the VII Central Pay Commission with all consequential benefits to the applicants in the interest of justice and be pleased to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
2. The brief facts
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
