Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
S. K. Sinha, Administrative Member, A. P. Singh, Judicial Member
Nikhilesh Kumar Manjhi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of disciplinary proceedings over caste certificate verification (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. dispute over applicant's defence statement and procedural fairness (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. charge memo and io findings perverse due to lack of applicant's involvement (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. judicial review permits interference for perversity in disciplinary findings (Para 17 , 18) |
| 5. quashing proceedings; no view on caste certificate genuineness (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
ORDER [ ORAL ]
Per: Sunil Kumar Sinha, Member (Admn.):-
Applicant has preferred this OA being aggrieved by the order passed by Disciplinary Authority on 22.01.2015 imposing the penalty of dismissal from service in a disciplinary proceeding. Applicant has prayed in this OA to quash and set aside the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority imposing the penalty, the charge memo dated 18.10.2007, the Inquiry Report dated 17.09.2014 and the order of Appellate Authority and to allow the applicant to join duty with immediate effect.
2. Applicant’s case as set out in the OA is that he was appointed as Sorting Assistant under RMS PT. Dn. Patna as ST candidate on 28.09.1997. Applicant had sub
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
