Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, Member (J)
Rashmi Devi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant seeks amended pension and recovery refund. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. employee's service history and erroneous macp grant. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 19) |
| 3. parties' arguments on recovery without notice. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. rafiq masih guidelines prohibit recovery from retirees. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. erroneous benefits can be withdrawn by administration. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. partly allow oa; refund recovery with interest. (Para 23 , 24) |
ORDER
1. The instant Original Application under Section 19 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 has been filed for the following reliefs :-
“(i) “Direct the respondents to issue fresh amended PPO and fixed the pension of the applicant on the last Pay Band of Rs. 5200-20200 Grade pay 2400/- on the post of Mason-II instead of Pay Band of Rs.5200-20200 Grade Pay 2000/- Khalasi and accordingly pay the differences of arrear of pension and also make settlement of retiral benefits on the said pay and pay the differences of arrear of retiral benefits with 18% interest per annum to the applicant from the date of entitlement to the date of actual payment is being made to the applicant.
(ii) Direct the respondents to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
